2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the mistake while making a confession of the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim is considered favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant who was inside the floor of tending the victim to inflict bodily injury on the victim. In light of the method and content of the crime, etc., the nature of the crime is grave, in view of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the repeated crime period due to multiple times of criminal punishment including punishment due to violent crimes, and all of the sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.