공사대금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as otherwise determined in paragraph (2), and thus, citing it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(In full view of the arguments and additional evidence submitted by the Defendant, it is reasonable to find facts in the first instance court and make a determination, except where the damage relating to the value difference in the balcony expansion area is additionally recognized). The 8th parallel of the first instance judgment “from the building of this case” to the 4th parallel of the 8th parallel of the first instance judgment shall be amended as follows, and the 8th parallel of 5 to 12
The difference in the price of the instant building is KRW 80,979,00 (i.e., the difference in the value of the exclusive use area + KRW 76,738,00 + the difference in the value of the public area of KRW 3,778,00 in balcony expansion + the difference in the value of the public area of KRW 463,00). As such, damages due to nonperformance is KRW 80,979,000 (i.e., the appraisal by the appraiserF of the first instance trial), it is reasonable to compensate for damages as much as the price decline is acknowledged due to the decrease in the area of balcony.
2) Following the 8th 20th 20th son of the first instance judgment of "the increase in the size of a rooftop" is added "(the defendant asserts that the size of a rooftop has not been increased, but according to the changed drawings, completion drawings and the appraisal results of the appraiser F of the first instance trial, etc., the increase in the size of a rooftop is recognized)."
The 9th sentence of the first instance judgment “5,040,700 won (=77,201,000 x 70 per cent)” is amended to “5,300 won (=80,979,000 x 70 per cent)”.
The 11 and 12 pages of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended as follows:
G. The Defendants’ damages amounted to KRW 103,902,864 (i.e., reduction of construction cost due to the reduction of total floor area + KRW 21,204,00 + KRW 56,685,300 due to the reduction of total floor area + KRW 26,013,564) minus Plaintiff’s additional construction cost of KRW 46,541,960 in lieu of defect repairs.