A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for three years and six months, respectively.

Defendant A and Defendant B were in de facto marital relationship. From October 2012 to Busan Metropolitan City E, the Defendant was in charge of managing the funds and books of the above company, and B was in charge of managing the said company’s business and customer management affairs.

The Defendant and B, together with the victim G, lent KRW 135 million from the victim G to the business fund, and operated the said F, but the project is not well-grounded, and thus, the Defendant and B could not actually engage in the business from August 2013, and eventually closed the business around July 2014.

1. The crime B against the victim H was committed on June 2013, 2013 to the victim H who became aware of the operation of the above F in the vicinity of the Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Suwon-gu, where “I would have an opportunity to supply fish, shellfish, etc. in I E, a corporation should be created and operated together with the corporation. The hydroman shall be prepared by us, and the Sinman shall have the necessary capital invested.

Around July 2013, Defendant, B, and the victim established the J corporation, a corporation, the main purpose of which is to retail the wholesale and retail of fish and shellfish together, stating that the profits are distributed to 5:5.

After August 2013, the Defendant sent 100 million won since it is necessary to pay down money to the victim to purchase the tropy shots from the petdo at the lower court’s office.

different. “A” is false, and the victim is to send the same value as “A’s head-to-head-peach head-pat to B.

Upon the inspection of “B”, “B” can be seen as “B”.

“The victim made a false statement.”

On August 8, 2013, the defendant continuously sent 50 million won to the victim in the above F Office as a sufficient down payment, because he/she can deliver it to I by a sufficient management officer.

(C) The phrase “A” was false, and whether the victim sent a down payment to B.

Upon the inspection of “B”, “B” can be seen as “B”.

“The victim made a false statement.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant.