beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.10.30 2014노635

무고

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty on the ground of false facts in spite of the fact that the defendant actually engaged in sexual traffic D and D, such as the fact-finding report, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principle

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (1.5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The defendant argued that the judgment of the court below is identical to that of the court below, and the court below rejected it in the second chapter 11 of the judgment of the court below. The court below rejected it. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the defendant sought E transfer from the police to find a sexual intercourse, i.e., the defendant was suffering from her shoulder and hume at the time of the fact-finding that he was unfolded. The defendant stated that "I reported the fact-finding only if I reported the fact-finding without a sexual intercourse." The money was money as money as d, and the defendant reported the fact that "I reported the fact-finding only if there are too many fines (the 29th page of the evidence record)" (the 29th page of the defendant's request for formal trial prepared by the defendant, and the contents of the contents can not be found. In addition to the records and the judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below is correct and correct by closely comparing the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

B. The Defendant’s absence of identical convictions on the assertion of unfair sentencing is a favorable circumstance to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is highly likely to be committed in that the defendant reported false facts that D had engaged in illegal sexual traffic business without any special reason, and the defendant intended to make a false report on the D with respect to the material and fatal contents, without any special reason.

The defendant is the defendant.