However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 30, 2006, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court. On December 26, 2006, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. On December 12, 2007, the same court was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Criminal facts

On June 8, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant driven a passenger car with C low-speed in the state of alcohol alcohol 0.213% at approximately 10 meters from the 100-meter range to the front of the so-called So-to-to-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-Sto-S

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the actions taken against the driver, and report on the status of the driver's practice;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of suspect's records of driving under the influence of alcohol), and application of three copies of summary orders;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do139, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

1. Probation, community service or order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;