성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 3,00,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C and D, “E” and “F”.
1. No one shall arrange sexual intercourse or other similar sexual intercourse in return for promising an unspecified person to give, receive, or promise to give, any money, valuables or other financial benefits;
Nevertheless, from January 30, 2020 to February 19, 2020, the Defendant placed an advertisement with the trade name of “G”, “H”, “I”, and “F” on the Internet commercial sex acts site, “G”, “H”, and reported this to the head of Thailand’s nationality, in which a male customer who had discovered the advertisement is employed in advance, provided guidance to the above heading room where a female employee is waiting, such as J(J, K: K), L (L, and name M) and had him pay for the commercial sex acts of KRW 80,00,00 and sexual intercourse according to the course.
Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.
2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, operates a commercial sex trafficking business with the trade name “E” and “F”;
(a) employ 40,00 won from 40,000 won in accordance with the course, out of the amount of sexual traffic paid to customers by Thailand, who entered the Republic of Korea as a qualification for visa exemption (B-1) on January 30, 2020, without employment status, under the condition that the J (J, Provisional: K):
B. Around February 18, 2020, upon entering the eligibility for visa exemption (B-1) and having no status of employment status, employment was made on condition of providing KRW 40,000 to KRW 90,00 according to the course among the sexual traffic payment paid by customers.
As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police interrogation protocol against N,O, L, and J 1.