beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.31 2015가단51107

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. D On October 8, 2004, around 11:55, D driving a motor vehicle in the test at the front of the EF-distance Intersection in the front of the CF in Switzerland, and the left-hand part of G driving is shocked (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. At around 13:35 on the same day of the instant accident, G transferred the instant case to the J Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant School Foundation A (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) on February 28, 2005 on the ground that the symptoms during the instant case were not revealed while hospitalized immediately after undergoing the diagnosis of acute climatic confection, and the explosion escape certificate, and was hospitalized to the “I Hospital” located in Chuncheon City.

C. On March 7, 2005, G received the diagnosis that it was an inherent nuclear collapse certificate at the Defendant Hospital No. 4-5, and as a result, G was diagnosed as a result of its treatment, on the 22th day of the same month, G received from Defendant B and C, a doctor outside of the country of the Defendant Hospital, a doctor outside of the country of the Defendant Hospital, high-frequency heat therapy (hereinafter “instant operation”).

G argued on the 23th day of the same month that the Defendant Hospital could not maintain the attitude that she has pains and sits on both sides of the Defendant Hospital, but around the 27th day of the same month, she was able to wear a lug auxiliary device and recover the toilet to the extent that she has been restored.

After that, G complaining of the pains and the pains of the upper part of G, the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital conducted the X-ray inspection of G around the beginning of April 2005, but there was no abnormal opinion, and there was no abnormal opinion even though it conducted the blood test and the climatic image inspection on the 23th of the same month.

As a result, around the 25th day of the same month after G was not able to move away from the 1st day of the same month after G, medical personnel at the Defendant hospital recommended a movement after reducing the shot roof, and recommended to conduct a nearby inspection and treatment as it is doubtful that he is able to be able to be able to do so, G is all the more.