Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

1. At around 16:00 on February 27, 2015, Defendant A: (a) loaded 21.2 tons of presses 21.2 tons on a truck of 25 tons B treatment25 tons; and (b) obstructed the measurement of vehicle load by operating a vehicle by operating the equipment of the vehicle in accordance with the vehicle by operating the vehicle at his own discretion when the weight measurement conducted at 130 tons of national expressway 130 tons at the Cheongra business office of 1048 as in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, with the weight of 11.19 tons at 5 5 tons; and (c) the weight measurement conducted at the luxal inspection station exceeds 10 tons, which is the limited weight of 5 dus; and (d) arbitrarily, he/she operated the equipment of the vehicle in accordance with the measurement.

2. As to the business of the above corporation at the above time and at the above place, A, who is an employee of the sale freight Co., Ltd., Defendant Co., Ltd., committed the above violation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Control note;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles that have violated traffic regulations, such as notification to detect traffic-related vehicles (act of interference with measuring proper discretion), report on detection of vehicles that have violated the restriction on operation, notification on detection of vehicles violating the restriction on operation of motorways,

1. Article 115 subparagraph 5 of the Road Act, Article 78 (1) of the same Act, Articles 116, 115 subparagraph 5 of the Road Act, and Article 78 (1) of the same Act, and Articles 116, and 78 (1) of the Road Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);