Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant operates a taxi for business purposes under the jurisdiction of the "B company".

At around 02:00 on November 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) embezzled, without following necessary procedures, the victim, who was unable to know his name in front of the department store in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, because he fell into the taxi in front of the department store, he did not take the necessary procedures, such as returning to the victim upon receipt of the de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;