2. In full view of all the factors such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, taking account of the following factors: (a) the Defendant is led to the confession of the crime; and (b) the Defendant actively cooperates in the investigation of the narcotics offender by the investigative agency up to the trial; (c) there was the history of punishment for the same crime; (d) the fact that the act was committed during the repeated crime period for the same kind of crime; (e) the transfer of phiphones handled; and (e) the fact that the transfer of phiphones was not easy; and (e) the fact that the transfer of phiphones was the response to the training of phiphones as a result of the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.