If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On December 28, 2012, at around 18:19, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D (ma, 40 years of age) and Handphone fee settlement issues; (b) expressed the victim in a horse dispute that “web w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w b w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w s

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is old, considering the fact that three times of fine for the same kind of fine and the defendant first started physical fighting, the amount of fine for the summary order is appropriate.