On July 13, 2016, at around 05:58, the Defendant 05:58, while drinking alcohol in the flash of the D market owned by the victim E located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that the victim, while doing a dispute with the victim, while drinking in the flash of the D market owned by the victim E, the victim went back to the face of the defendant, and the victim went back to her business after completing the business of the victim, and was a dangerous object purchased at the nearby convenience store, the Defendant cut down the market price of the above flash of the packing horse owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a CCTV analysis for crime prevention);

1. Standard for sentencing for the reason of sentencing under Article 369(1) of the Criminal Act and Articles 366(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act with regard to criminal facts [the scope of recommending punishment] types 1 of habitual repeated crimes, special damage and damage [the range of habitual crimes, repeated crimes, special damage and damage] [the range of April to October] in the mitigation area (special mitigation), in a case where punishment is not granted or significant damage has been restored, the sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following conditions of sentencing, including the defendant's age, occupation, character and behavior, family relation, circumstances before and after the crime, etc.

- The recognition and reflect of the commission of the crime, the agreement with the victims, and the initial agreement with the victim - The crime of this case is committed after being released from prison labor with the suspension of the execution of the sentence during the prison labor, and its possibility of criticism