beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.01.22 2013고단1584

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was subject to criminal punishment for insulting a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report on his/her failure at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, and was subject to criminal punishment for insult.

피고인은 2013. 6. 20. 00:00경 위 주점을 찾아가 피해자에게 “너는 불법이니까 문 닫을 준비나 해, 그때 왜 나를 신고했어 , 신고했으니까 너도 끝장이야”라고 고함을 치고, 술을 마시는 손님들에게도 소리를 지르는 등 소란을 피워 손님들이 술을 마시다가 주점을 나가도록 하고, 신고를 받고 경찰관이 출동하자 “경찰관을 잘 알아 경찰이 감싸고돌아서 배짱이냐 ”라고 소리를 질렀다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant for about 40 minutes by force.

2. The Defendant, at the same date and time as the preceding paragraph of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and at a place where 112 was reported and 112, saw that the Defendant scam the eggs from the slope G, which is a police officer of the Yongsan Police Station, who was called out to go home, and scam back to the country, the Defendant scambling, “Ik, this scam, this scam, the police officer, so that the scam, the scambling, the scambling, the scambling, the scambling of the scam, and the scambling of the scam and the scambling of the scam.” The Defendant scamed the above G with his head, and scam

Then, the Defendant, a police officer affiliated with the same police box, expressed that “this farb woo, farb farb, farc, farc, farc, farc, farc, farc, farc farc,” was farced twice by drinking the farc of the above H, and carried the farc in one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, G and H;

1.I and J, respectively.