However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On March 31, 2020, the Defendant visited the Daegu District Court Agreements, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, 364, and the 2nd office of civil affairs, and applied for perusal and duplication of trial records on civil cases of objection against provisional attachment No. 2020Ra56, the Daegu District Court 2020Ra, and applied for perusal and duplication of the above civil litigation records from the public official in charge of name in charge of the court in charge of the perusal of the records, and brought one copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the 19th page of the above litigation records by using the gap in surveillance.

Accordingly, the defendant has undermined the utility of documents used by the Daegu District Court, which is a public official, and has stolen the records of trial managed by the public official in the name of the court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation;

1. A copy of the contract or a copy of each application;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act (U.S.) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (U.S.) concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen for the sentence (to take into account the fact that the nature of the crime is grave as a matter of court trial records);

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the fact that a mistake is pened in depth, the part of the relevant contract was returned, the plan was planned in advance to commit a crime, and the crime of this case was affected by the relevant case;

In light of the fact that the sentence of imprisonment is not visible, and that there is no record of being punished as a sentence of imprisonment