A. The contents of Defendant A1’s request made by the Defendant in misunderstanding the legal principles are that it is possible to transfer or acquire the I fishery right again. However, at the time of request by the Defendant, the Defendant was in charge of the industrial overall management and family relation registration at the Y-Myeon office, and only upon request by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries for a daily telephone call to change the B, etc. located in a difficult place from the Y-si, and the Defendant was in charge of the transfer or acquisition of the I fishery right, and the I fishery right is assigned to the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. In addition, the question as to whether it is possible to transfer or acquire the I fishery right can be made free of all the people. Therefore, even if it is recognized that I fishery right is related to the Defendant’s duty. Even if it is allowed to transfer or acquire the I fishery right, it is unreasonable that the Defendant’s request by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries) did not receive the Defendant’s money and valuables from the Defendant.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won by Defendant B) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to Defendant A’s assertion of the misapprehension of the legal doctrine, the Defendant denied the duty relationship and its consideration in relation to the facts charged, since he/she is not a duty assigned to him/her but a question is possible, not a duty assigned to him/her.

Bribery is fair in the performance of duties and trust in society.