On April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, around the Defendant’s home at Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 201, 1410, the Defendant: (b) found the victim D, who was not divorced from his/her his/her his/her father, as a debt issue; and (c) tried to promptly resolve it.

At this time, the Defendant refused to communicate with the victim and attempted to take the victim by hand, but the victim was faced with the victim's hand as soon as possible, and the victim was faced with the victim's injury on the part of his hand, and the victim was faced with the victim's injury, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of a medical certificate, damage photographing statute;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted self-defense as to Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Code (the crime of this case was committed by the victim, regardless of whether the victim was the defendant or not, and there are circumstances that may be considered in the process of the crime, and at the time, the defendant was damaged by the victim's assault, and the first offender, etc.) of the Criminal Code (the crime of this case was committed by the defendant at the time of the crime of this case). At the time of the crime of this case, the defendant and the defense counsel assaulted the defendant after finding the defendant's arms while under the influence of alcohol in the defendant's house, putting them into the defendant's arms by force, putting the defendant's arms into the house, and pushed the defendant into the house, and therefore, the defendant did not injure the D's losses attached to him to defend D's assault. Thus

In light of the evidence, the court below found that the defendant who was controlled by D was sealed and the dispute occurred between the defendant and the house, but the defendant's circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence are acknowledged.