However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 00:20 on August 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was in front of the residence of the victim D (the age of 66) who was under operation 507 of the Ildong-dong Dadong-dong Damdong-dong Damdong-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter referred to as the “2-year-dong 507”), while the victim was waiting to obstruct the passage of the wind by opening the entrance, the Defendant caused the victim to have the victim go beyond the floor by making the victim go beyond the floor, and caused the victim to have the victim go beyond the upper part of the upper part of the left-hand part, which requires a treatment for about 8 weeks.

2. Property damage: (a) the Defendant continued to operate the said apartment in the Defendant’s residential area located in 505; (b) returned to the front of 507, the kitchen 507, which was owned by the victim D, and then damaged the Defendant’s entrance door 507, which was placed in the victim D with the kitchen knife so that the repair cost can be damaged by destroying the small room room with the corridor; and (c) the Defendant continued to open the entrance door owned by the victim E in the said apartment with the kitchen 508, which was in operation of the said apartment, and destroyed the small room room so that the repair cost is needed.

3. On the front of the foregoing 507 path, the Defendant continued to commit the same crime as the above 112th and 2th, and received a request from the police officer G slope, Assistant H, and Police Officer I belonging to the F District Unit of the Gyeonggi Gyeonggi Police Station, which called “I must go to go to the police officer, she must go to go, sweet, sweet, and sweet,” despite the demand from the police officer's slope G, Assistant H, and Police I called “I must go to go to go to the police officer, she must go to go against, and go to go against, the police officer.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened police officers with dangerous objects and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement to G, H, I, J, K, and E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each damaged part;