2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's wrong recognition of his or her mistake and reflects on the situation, the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments without considerable social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant has been punished for the same crime, the defendant has continuously engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic in the same place, even though there was a double crackdown on the sexual traffic establishments in this case, and committed the crime of aiding and abetting a criminal who interferes with the appropriate exercise of the State's penal authority and waste investigation power to avoid punishment. There is no special change in circumstances after the court below was sentenced, and there is no other special change in circumstances after the judgment below was sentenced, it is unreasonable for the court below to deem that all the records and arguments of this case, including the age, character and behavior of the defendant, occupation and environment, motive and circumstances after the crime, and even if punishment is too favorable to the above given consideration.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.