A. 1) Determination as to the claim for rent 1) The Plaintiff’s claim for rent 20 million won from March 2012 to July 2014, 201 to Defendant B, “D,” is not disputed between the parties, or can be recognized by taking into account the overall purport of entry and pleading as to the Plaintiff’s rent 261 million won (i.e., KRW 9 million x 29 million x 29 months) and delayed payment damages (the Defendant B, from March 1, 2012 to May 2012, 200, KRW 300,000, KRW 2010, KRW 500). However, the Plaintiff’s claim for rent 201 to Defendant B’s claim for rent 205, KRW 201, KRW 300,000, KRW 501, KRW 200,000 as a whole, KRW 301,20,000.

(C) According to the above facts, Defendant B, on August 28, 2014, remitted KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, Defendant B’s assertion that this part of this part of this claim is not accepted). Defendant B’s obligation to pay the rent of KRW 94 million to the Plaintiff (i.e., KRW 3 million (= KRW 20 million) (i.e., KRW 19 million worth KRW 15 million) and KRW 5 million ( KRW 5 million worth KRW 20 million), the obligation to pay the rent to the Plaintiff was extinguished within the scope of KRW 10 million.5 million.

As such, Defendant B’s repayment.