도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that A, an employee of the Defendant, operated B vehicle in violation of the limited weight around 10:00 on September 13, 1993 with respect to the Defendant’s business.
2. Determination
A. The prosecutor prosecuted the above charged facts by applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993).
B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8314, Apr. 15, 2008; Act No. 9775, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 945, Mar. 19, 20194>
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.