2. The judgment below, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, determined the above punishment against the defendant. Considering the fact that the traffic accident in this case caused serious injury to the victim after the first grade 1 of the brain disease, and the circumstances asserted by the prosecutor as a reason for the unfavorable sentencing in the trial at the trial at the trial at the court below are considered to have been sufficiently taken into account when determining the punishment at the court below. There is no record of criminal punishment against the defendant, and there is no record of criminal punishment against the defendant, and the negligence of the victim who illegally crossed the road of three-lanes without permission on the new wall at the new wall at the time of the traffic accident in this case seems to have contributed to a certain part, and the decision of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because it is too unfford so that the judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

shall not be appointed by a person.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.