매매대금
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 113,00,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 5, 2014 to March 25, 2015.
1. On January 16, 2013, the Defendant and the Non-Party Dori-dong Co., Ltd. purchased each real estate listed in the separate sheet (attached Table 2, in the case of the real estate listed on No. 2, thereafter divided into three large 497 square meters and D8 square meters) owned by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff, for KRW 300 million (hereinafter referred to as “the primary contract”).
AB concluded the agreement.
Although the Plaintiff and the above buyers agreed to KRW 300 million as the purchase price, the contract entered the purchase price in KRW 374 million.
With respect to the payment of down payment of KRW 150 million, the Plaintiff and the buyers agreed to pay the remainder amount of KRW 120 million on July 30, 2013.
After such an agreement, the buyer paid 30 million won out of the down payment.
On February 7, 2014, the buyer delayed the performance of the obligation to pay the remainder, paid 7 million won to the Plaintiff.
While the buyer of the above sales contract delayed the payment of the balance to the plaintiff, the defendant on July 2, 2014, the list of real estate attached hereto.
1. 13.2/129 shares in the land stated and a list of the attached real estate;
4. It is referred to as "the second contract to purchase the land in the description in the amount of KRW 186 million from the plaintiff", and "the second contract to purchase it in the amount of KRW 100 million"
In addition, after completing the registration of ownership transfer for the above land from the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30 million out of the remaining trade amount to the Plaintiff on July 21, 2014.
The defendant on August 4, 2014, the list of attached real estate
1. The remaining 115.8/129 shares in the land stated and a list of attached real estate;
2. The Plaintiff prepared a sales contract to purchase the indicated land with a price of KRW 186 million (hereinafter “third-party contract”) and received the registration of ownership transfer from the Plaintiff for the said land.
[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute between the parties, Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 6.