기업형임대주택공급촉진지구지정제안서불수용처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The contents asserted by the Plaintiff in this court are not significantly different from those asserted by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and the judgment of the first instance court rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion even if the parties re-examine the Plaintiff’s assertion based on the evidence presented by the first instance court and the first instance court is justifiable.
Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
The plaintiff filed an application for resumption of argument and submitted a preparatory document through Law Firm G, which was newly appointed after the closing of argument in the trial at the court. In other words, even if considering the evidence No. 9 submitted by the defendant in the trial at the court, it is not different from the conclusion that the disposition in this case was legitimate within the discretionary authority by balancing legitimate interests, and it is not necessary to further review the argument.