To the extent that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her defense right, no person who recognizes criminal facts by rhythizing the facts charged shall obtain a subsidy or use a subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

1. On May 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around May 1, 2013, the Defendant employed as childcare teachers at D childcare centers operated by the Defendant in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, without filing a report on his/her dismissal from office with the Yeonsu-gu office even though he/she submitted his/her resignation around May 20, 2013; and (b) was working normally at D childcare centers from the above date to July 31, 2013.

On the other hand, 3,170,000 subsidies were illegally provided, such as basic childcare fees, school building research expenses, school building environment improvement expenses, etc.

2. On June 3, 2013, the Defendant reported that F was employed as a childcare teacher at the aforementioned D childcare center and that F was employed as a childcare teacher at the D childcare center, and that F was employed as a childcare teacher at the D childcare center, even though F did not work normally at the D childcare center and served as an assistant teacher only when necessary, the Defendant was falsely reported that F was working as a childcare teacher at the said childcare center from the above date to December 31, 2013 and received subsidies of KRW 11,190,80 in total, including basic childcare fees, teachers’ treatment improvement expenses, teachers’ research expenses, school improvement expenses, school teachers’ environment improvement expenses, and school encouragement allowances.

3. On April 1, 2013, the Defendant reported that G was employed as a part-time assistant teacher by employing G as a part-time assistant teacher at the above D childcare center, but falsely reported that G had been employed as a paper-general teacher, and then falsely reported that G had worked as a paper-general teacher from the above date to September 27, 2013, thereby denying the Defendant’s subsidies of KRW 6,242,70 in total, including basic childcare fees, teachers’ treatment improvement expenses, etc.

4. On August 1, 2013, the Defendant reported as if he/she employed H as a part-time assistant teacher at the above D childcare center, but falsely reported that he/she was employed as a paper-general teacher, and then H is a paper-general teacher from the above date to November 30, 2013.