The defendant is a person who has been employed as a production worker of D Co., Ltd. operated by C from April 2004 to January 2005.

On September 2, 2011, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the second trial date of the Cheongju Building Fire-Fighting Case No. 201, 84, and made a testimony after taking an oath in the criminal law of the Goyang Branch of the Goyang District Court around 2, 201.

The Defendant testified from the prosecutor that “At the time Defendant C and F testified that it was discovered that Defendant C and C had a cellular phone in the police inspection factory,” while talking between Defendant C and Defendant C, F, who is the wife of Defendant C and Defendant C, at the company house of the State after a fire accident, the Defendant testified that “E was asked about the fact that she had seen that she had a fire, and that she was asked about the fact,” and that “at the time, Defendant C and F had a talked that she had a cell phone in the police inspection factory.”

However, the defendant did not have any knowledge that the above C/F dialogues with the above contents.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a witness who took an oath under the law, made a false statement contrary to his memory, and issued a perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

2. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the examination record of a witness to the defendant;

1. Relevant Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;