The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

On February 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) moved the body of the victim E (hereinafter referred to as “A”), a female toilet at a club located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon on February 9, 2018, and opened the door to the change of the victim’s body for male toilets, and opened the door to the change of the victim, and (b) repeated the victim’s neck and sson again, and “I am end as soon as possible.”

only once, it shall be terminated.

The phrase “be off,” “the victim tried to rape by putting the victim’s fright and panty to spanty,” and inserting the sexual organs. However, under the toilet, the victim’s frighten who confirmed the victim’s spanty was not able to enter and depart from the wind. However, the victim’s fright, which confirmed the victim’s spanty, did not constitute an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning damaged photographs, photographs taken at the time of arrest, and CCTV images recorded CDs;

1. Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order to disclose or notify information, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (a) is deemed to have committed any sexual crime in the judgment of the Defendant, but if it is deemed that the Defendant had no criminal record of the same kind, with the background of the crime and the circumstances before and after the crime, the Defendant is likely to repeat the crime even after having

It is difficult to see it.

The disclosure of the personal information of the defendant is greater than the need to notify the disclosure of the personal information of the defendant.

The decision is judged.

As such, there is a special reason that the defendant should not disclose or notify the personal information of the defendant) and his/her defense counsel.