A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct: around 14:00 on June 2, 2015, the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) around 14:00 on the same day, that Defendant A was tightly in a de facto marital relationship E in Jinju-si; and (b) around 14:05 on the same day, Defendant B was asked by the slope G belonging to the F District District of the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station, which called the site after receiving the report of assault by Defendant B, to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault; and (c) the said G used the Defendant as a buckbuck.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the proper execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order and the control of crimes, and at the same time, ordered the victim G (the age of 45) to provide approximately one week medical treatment.

2. Joint criminal conduct by the Defendants: Interference with business;

A. On March 26, 2015, from around 17:00 to around 17:10, the Defendants, along with the Defendants, prevented those who wish to receive treatment from entering the hospital, by putting a voice, such as “the head of the hospital, immediately deducted the vehicle at present, and otherwise filing a complaint for viewing,” on the ground that the vehicle parked in the J Hospital operated by the victim I in the J Hospital in the Jari-si from around 17:0 to around 17:10, on the ground that the vehicle parked in the parking lot is protruding back to India.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's hospital care service by force.

B. On April 12, 2015, from around 12:30 to 13:00 of the same day, the Defendants, along with the Defendants, led customers, who had meals in the above restaurant, to go out of the disturbance, such as bringing a voice “I would see if you walk off on the road,” on the ground that they parked a vehicle on the road operated by the victim L, which was operated by the said restaurant, on the street of the said restaurant.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force.

3. The defendant.