2. In light of the judgment, the fact that the defendant reflects each of the crimes of this case, the majority of the damaged goods were returned, and some of the victims expressed their intention not to punish the victim is favorable.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant repeatedly stolen the same type of crime despite the history of punishment several times; (b) a considerable number of the returned damaged goods have been damaged by cutting them during the course of theft by the Defendant; and (c) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment; and (d) the various sentencing conditions specified in the records and pleadings of the instant case are deemed unfair. Therefore, the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.