If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

At around 19:55 on September 14, 2013, the Defendant driven a blood alcohol concentration of 0.195% 0.195% and suffered injury, such as salt and tension, in need of approximately two weeks of light-based treatment from 1,000, the opposite line, which was driven by the victim C (the age of 61) driving at one lane in the opposite line, due to the occupational negligence, while driving the D SN125 Orba, and driving the D SN125 Orba, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, in the direction of the 2-lane of light-based treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the statement on the situation of traffic accident in preparation E, written statement on the occurrence of traffic accident, and written statement on the situation of traffic accident in preparation C;

1. To enter the initial action at the scene of a traffic accident, the on-site inspection report, the statement of the situation of a host driver, and the report on detection of a host driver; and

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to accident-related photographs;

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Articles 55(1)6 of the same Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15448, Apr. 2, 2008) (see, 201; Supreme Court Decision 200Da1448, Apr. 2, 201)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;