However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 6, 2017, the Defendant was young male in front of the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun B around 03:55 on August 6, 2017

“Abre upon receipt of a report, “Abre” refers to “Isked down at the roadside,” and “Isked him/her,” and assaulted a slope D affiliated with a plenary box of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station C, “Isk amb and kb kbsk,” the face of the said D once a week occurs in the Abre’s own flapt, flabing, flabing the flab, and walking the flae three times, such as flab, and flae, by asking the right kne once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person who has the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] 2 years of the suspension of the execution of six months (the fact that the defendant, including violent crimes, committed the instant crime, has no record of punishment heavier than that of a fine, comprehensive consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the circumstance that the defendant committed the instant crime, and the circumstance that there is no record of punishment heavier than that of a fine)