2. The lower court, under favorable circumstances in which the Defendant reflects the instant crime, determined the sentence (eight months) by taking into account the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., as well as various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the fact that the Defendant committed a repeated crime during the same type of repeated crime period, and the fact that the Defendant did not endeavor to recover the damage.

The grounds for the court below's improper sentencing (a confession, reflectivity, expected damage repayment, existence of dependent) alleged by the defendant are shown to be the grounds for the court below's determination of the punishment against the defendant, and the above conditions of the sentencing changed otherwise.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.