2. The judgment of the court below is not unfair because the defendant's age, character, environment, family relation, circumstances, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered to have many kinds of criminal records, etc., but the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period despite the fact that the defendant had a large number of identical criminal records; the crime of selling Meptas is very poor in the sense that there is a great social harm to the society and the state; the administration of narcotics is a serious crime detrimental to the soundness of the society and the state due to its toxicity; the amount of narcotics handled by the defendant is not large; the sentence of the court below is the lowest in the sentencing guidelines recommended sentence even if considering the defendant's important investigation cooperation submitted in the trial; the sentence of the court below is taken into account the defendant's important investigation cooperation, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.