When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:50 on March 26, 2017, the Defendant: (b) there was a person who prevents the victim D from driving a bicycle in front of him, who was on board the bicycle, and was in front of him; and (c) the Defendant stated, “I am off, cut off, me off, and me to move the vehicle immediately; and (d) the victim would move the vehicle.”

In addition, the victim openly insultingd the victim by openly referring to “aggravating the same year, killing and leaving away from the inside of the vehicle,” “a pair of years, h.”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant merely expressed that the injured person would stop on the way to the vehicle, that “I am off, cut off, get this son, etc.,” and that the injured person would have been employed in the price for the Defendant, and there was no humnasium for the victim, “I am away from the year to sing off, sing off, sing off from the inside of the vehicle,” and there was no humnasium for the victim as “I am to humnas.”

B. The Defendant took a bath.

Even if there are only E in addition to the victim, there is no performance.

2. Determination

A. Until this Court, the victim of an insulting speech and the victim of an insulting speech and the victim of the victim and the victim of the victim were expressed in the investigation agency and the victim of the victim of the victim, such as “the victim of an insulting speech and the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim’s hysium,” “the victim of the victim’s hysium,

The statements are consistently made and there is no circumstance to deny the credibility of the statements.

Although the defendant alleged that he was immediately used in price E and did not take a h’s bath, F, a witness, is divided into five minutes of virtual dialogues between the defendant and E, and he was pushed ahead of the bicycle that the defendant was flick even though he did not have a physical contact.