2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The relationship between the parties (1) Plaintiff A is the owner of Mlue House B 101 (hereinafter referred to as “Mlue House”) in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter referred to as “Mlue House”), Plaintiff B 201, Plaintiff B 204, Plaintiff D 102, Plaintiff B 203, Plaintiff F 101, Plaintiff C Dong 201, Plaintiff C Dong 202, Plaintiff H 202, Defendant J 102, Defendant J 104, and Defendant L 202.

(2) Defendant K is the wife of Defendant J.

B. (1) Each owner of M&D housing, including the Plaintiffs, has prepared and executed a power of delegation to the Defendant J for the implementation of a contract for the sale of M&D housing, stating the expected sale price.

(2) On January 30, 2015, the Plaintiffs, Defendant J, L, and L concluded a sales contract to sell each house owned to N (O, P). The Plaintiffs sold the house owned at KRW 290 million to KRW 290 million or KRW 295 million. Defendant J sold the house owned at KRW 440 million, and Defendant L sold the house at KRW 350 million.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 4, Eul evidence 5 (including partial numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs asserts that, although they did not have a duty to pay brokerage fees or receipts and expenses when concluding a sales contract for each owned house, they shall deduct bookkeeping fees from the Plaintiffs in the form of preparing a sales contract even though they did not have a duty to do so, and that they shall seek compensation for damages by deceiving KRW 1,180,000 from each of the Plaintiffs.

Therefore, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendants' fraud of bookkeeping fees by deceiving the plaintiffs.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for this part is added.