However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the husband of the victim E (here, 54 years of age).

At around 14:20 on October 20, 2013, the Defendant asked the victim of the F2nd floor F of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to “I will not know why it is?” The victim sees that “I will see why I will see why I will do so?” The victim sees that “I will see why I will see and why I will see the heating? I will see why I will see I will do so? I will see I am I am I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am. am.., I am..., I am..

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (54 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning blades photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (the confession of a criminal conduct and the depth of a mistake is divided, the age of 72 years old, the punishment of a fine is imposed for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in around 1982, other circumstances such as the mental and health conditions of a defendant, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the repeated consideration in the above sentence) or more;