However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2015. 4. 4. 17:40경 인천 남구 C에 있는 피해자 D이 운영하는 ‘E식당’에서, 일행들과 같이 술을 마시던 중 큰 소리로 노래를 부르는 등 소란을 피워 위 피해자로부터 귀가해 달라는 요구를 받자, 테이블 위에 놓여 있던 음식물을 뒤엎고 가스를 폭파시키겠다고 소리를 지르고, 피해자에게 ‘썅년, 개같은 년’ 등으로 큰소리로 욕설을 하면서 피해자를 폭행하는 등 약 5시간에 걸쳐 소란을 피워 손님들이 그곳을 떠나게 하는 등 위력으로 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. The Defendant damaged the entrance to take the 60,000 won of repairing costs, such as walking the entrance door from several times to a part supporting the upper door of the entrance, on the ground that the disturbance, such as the date, place, and paragraph 1, such as the date, time, place, and paragraph 1, became out of the restaurant after the victim D, became out of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on receipts for repair of the cafeteria entrance doors, damaged photographs, and cafeteria entrance doors;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The reason for suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the favorable circumstances of the reasons for suspended sentence) is agreed with the victim, and the criminal records of the 11-time fine (including five times the same kind of fine), and the degree of damage, the age, character and conduct, environment of the defendant, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the order.