When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

At around 03:20 on April 11, 2013, the Defendant returned home under the influence of alcohol in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and arrived at the destination, and sought a fare of 32,000 won from the victim, and tried to drive her match. The Defendant, who was able to her to her with the Defendant, called “the her to her to her to her to her to her to her, to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements to C, records of seizure, investigation reports (time and charges of taxi getting on and off a taxi), and receipt of road works receipts;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order does not have any special criminal record except for the criminal record having minor criminal records, and the degree of assault is heavy, but the act of assaulting a taxi engineer without paying a taxi fee at the new wall time is deemed not to be less than the nature of the crime or crime, the defendant's act of walking away with his mobile phone was likely to be an investigation into the police. If it is not so, the victim could not be reported to the police because he did not specify the offender, and only the defense that does not fit the empirical rule or objective facts from the investigative agency to this court is not divided into the crime at all, and the defendant cannot be deemed to have been subject to a fine of three million won as provided in the summary order, considering the fact that the victim committed an attack with the victim and the victim appeared as witness at this court, and thus, the above fine of three million won cannot be deemed to have been more severe.