However, the defendants are above 2 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

[Public offering relation] The Defendants and D, E, F, G, H, and I shall post false goods on the Internet “N”, “O,” website, P, etc., which are false goods, and induce customers to buy them. After doing so as to make it difficult for the Defendants to sell the goods posted and other vehicles (one vehicle) at a low-end price, they shall enter into a contract with the first vehicle using the forged “public sale vehicle contract form” as if they were used in Q, and receive the price for the first vehicle. After the ex-factory the ex-factory procedure, they shall present the forged “Astuc approval slip,” and make an additional payment, such as a enormous installment, etc., which was received, such as the payment of the vehicle price for the vehicle, which was already received by the borrower, and shall not return the vehicle price to the lender at the price of the vehicle, and shall not return the vehicle price for the vehicle at the price of the vehicle to the court, as if they were used in Q.

Accordingly, from May 2018, Defendant B served in “M” from the beginning of February 2019, and Defendant A and Defendant C are vehicles for public sale, “A” and “A” and “A” and “A” and “A” and “A” are vehicles for public sale, with a view to the opening of a group or reading room (one-time room) and providing victims with information received from telephone counselors as if they were the first vehicle owner, and call with on-site sending employees as if they were the first vehicle owner.”