소유권이전등기말소 등
1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.
2. After filing an appeal.
1. The reasons why this Court has used this part of the basic facts are as follows: (a) the Court was sentenced to the 8th judgment of the court of first instance; (b) the above judgment became final and conclusive upon the dismissal of Defendant E’s appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2014No7, supra); (c) the part of the 9th judgment of the court of first instance is deleted; and (d) the part of the 9th judgment of the court of first instance is deleted from the 9th judgment of the court of first instance (which is the grounds for recognition) and is the same as the corresponding part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for deletion of “No. 9” from the 9th judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it
2. The reason why this Court has used this part of the judgment on the claim for the registration of transfer of ownership and the cancellation of registration of cancellation of right to collateral security by the plaintiff B, C, and D is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition of the pertinent part as follows. As such, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The 11th and 13th and 13th and 11th decisions of the first instance court are as follows: “A’s statement of evidence No. 24 or testimony of the party witness T cannot be viewed differently.” (b) No. 12th and 12th of the first instance judgment.”
The following facts are added: “(Supreme Court Decision 2009Da91828 Decided April 29, 2010 and Supreme Court Decision 91Da25963 Decided December 24, 1991, which is required by the Plaintiff, are related to the deception of real estate brokers, and it is not appropriate to apply the instant case differently from the instant case).” (C) After the 12th of the judgment of the first instance court, “The evidence recognized earlier and the result of the market price appraisal on the appraiserR of the first instance court,” each of the instant real estate prices at the time are KRW 120,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000.