A. From July 2009 to September 2013, the Plaintiff received a proposal from the Defendant to pay KRW 75,000,000,000 in the last sequence when he/she joined the order of management of the Defendant and paid KRW 1,000 per month for 50 months. From July 2009 to September 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,00,000 per month to the Defendant.

B. The Defendant continued to pay the remainder of KRW 25,00,000,000, among KRW 75,000,000 originally promised around September 2013, which was paid at KRW 50,000.

C. On May 10, 2015, the Plaintiff prepared a letter of payment stating that “The Defendant stated “20,000,000 won (the first “25,000,000 won”, but the Plaintiff changed the Defendant’s continued request to “20,000 won” to “20,000,000 won”) shall be paid by October 30, 2016, but the Plaintiff shall pay the Defendant’s continuous request by not later than October 30, 2016, but at the above time of the Do, it shall pay by adding interest at the rate of 3% per month” (hereinafter “instant letter of payment”).

Notwithstanding the letter of rejection of the instant payment, the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff KRW 20,000,000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 20,000,000 as well as damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum for the Plaintiff within the scope of interest rate for delay damages stipulated in the letter of payment from October 31, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the payment date stipulated in the letter of payment in this case.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.