However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 28, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant voluntarily accompanied the police box located in Kimpo-si, Gyeonggi-do, by filing a report on 112 report that she scambling the scam, and then was under investigation by the police officer D belonging to the above police box, and told the above police officer of “scambling, discarded, scambling,” and boomed about 20 copies of the police campaign log of the police box that was on the scambling box, and continued to display the above police officer, thereby obstructing the police officer from performing his/her legitimate duties concerning the investigation duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the police publicity complex where the defendant was collected;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant has the same record as the defendant, confession and reflects the crime, degree of

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;