beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.07 2015가합530558

보험수수료

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The summary of the case is the case where the plaintiff, an insurance solicitor belonging to the defendant's pressure stop point, claims part of the retirement pension introduction fee against the defendant.

On the premise, the Plaintiff worked as an insurance solicitor (FC) at the pressure stop point of the Defendant, an insurance company, from September 2009 to January 2013, 2013.

How to subscribe to retirement pension shall be one summary

In order to subscribe to retirement pension of a credit union, the fact that the credit union has to start up with the thickness of the credit union is that the direct service organization that has a retirement pension member at the time of customer base of the credit union is introduced only to the corporate business officer.

After introduction, the person in charge of the business of a corporation visits the relevant vertical group to enter into the contract, and after the conclusion of the contract, he/she has up the introduction fee prescribed in the thickness.

The first year: 2.0% (Allowance Policy Expenses) and after the second year: 0.2% fees shall be paid each year as long as the reserve is available.

(DB, DC, corporate type ITRA criteria: Provided, That it shall be limited to the completion of retirement pension cyber education, and 1.9% payment shall be made only for the first year of the failure of education (as of May 201) (as of May 201) and the FC's introduction fees out of the FC education data for retirement pension prepared by the Defendant are as follows:

【The Plaintiff’s assertion of the determination as to the facts without dispute, Gap’s evidence No. 2, and the issue of the overall purport of pleading (whether to recognize the Plaintiff’s contribution) was made by the Defendant to Eul of the Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Electric Power Corporation”) around October 209, which notified C (Seoul) of his request to allow the Plaintiff to participate in a retirement pension business operator, and requested the Plaintiff to include Eul and F in the Defendant Company. On April 201, the Plaintiff explained the Defendant’s retirement pension business to H, etc. of the Korea Eastern Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dong East Development”), which became aware of by introducing G, who is a successor of B, around April 201, and arranged for an interview with the Defendant’s KJ and cooperation in introducing the retirement pension.