Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant on the ground that the content of the instant printed material cannot be deemed as falling under a statement of specific facts that could undermine the victim’s social assessment, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to defamation

2. As a result of review of the records of determination, the court below is just in holding that the contents of the instant printed matter cannot be deemed to constitute a statement of specific facts, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles of defamation, which affected the conclusion of

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.