beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.27 2017누88062

유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The following judgments shall be added next to 7 pages 12 of the judgment of the first instance:

[The defendant argues that it is difficult to recognize the death of the deceased as an occupational accident because it is merely 45 hours a week average working hours of the deceased since it is merely 09:0 to 19:00 (5 days a week) and it is difficult to recognize the death of the deceased as an occupational accident, but the above criteria are not applicable to the suicide of this case as the criteria for 12 weeks prior to the outbreak of the disease, such as 12 weeks average working hours of the 60 hours per week average (64 hours a week average of the 44 hours a week preceding the outbreak of the disease).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.