2. The Defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case, and repented his mistake.

There is no record that the defendant has been punished for the same crime or has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment or more.

These points are favorable to the defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed by obtaining KRW 10 million from B under the pretext of arranging sexual traffic against foreign women in collusion with B, etc. and allowing police officers to make a non-detained investigation by solicitation, and offered a bribe of KRW 8 million to V, a police officer, which is not good for such crimes and crimes.

This case's violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act and the offering of bribe significantly damaged the public trust in society regarding the fairness and infiniteness of the duties performed by police officers.

These points are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, means and method of committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.