When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 14, 2014, around 04:23, the Defendant continued to see the victim E (the 53 years of age) who was aware of the victim’s body, which was frequently a guest at the sobry crying site where the Defendant was working, in the vicinity. The Defendant forced the victim to commit an indecent act outside the part of the victim’s body, which was put into the victim’s body in front of the computer, and forced the victim to take advantage of the cryp at the convenience point where the victim does not end. The Defendant used the cans and coffee together with the Defendant at the PC room where the victim used the cryp in accordance with the victim’s own computer. While the Defendant used the cans and coffee as the cryp in front of the computer, the Defendant took care of the victim’s body and then hump back the victim’s body, and forced the victim to take advantage of the part of the victim’s body, which was put in front of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 298 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to complete a program: Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. 가납명령 : 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 다음과 같은 정상들을 고려하여 주문과 같이 형을 정함. 유리한 정상 : 범행을 인정하면서 반성하고 있는 점, 형사처벌을 받은 전력이 없는 초범인 점 불리한 정상 : 피고인이 근무하던 찜질방 손님으로 안면이 있을 뿐 개인적으로 만난 적이 없었던 여성에게 치근대며 접근하여 저지른 범행이고, 볼썽사납게 피해자의 바지 속에 들어가 있는 상의를 꺼내어준다는 명목으로 피해자를 뒤에서 안고서 양손을 바지 깊숙이 넣어 추행한 범행으로 추행 정도 또한 가볍다고 할 수 없는 점 기타 : 피고인의 연령, 직업 및...