Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on the grounds that there was no proof of crime regarding intimidation among the facts charged in the instant case.

Examining the record, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the notification of harm and injury in the crime of intimidation.

Although the prosecutor appealeds the entire judgment of the court below against the defendant, the prosecutor does not state in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief the grounds for objection to the conviction.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.