beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.07.16 2016고단1266

관세법위반

Text

[Defendant A]

1. The punishment of the accused shall be one year;

2. Evidence No. 1 (former District Public Prosecutor's Office......)

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 order 1266]

1. If the name, standard, quantity, price, etc. of the goods involved in the joint crime committed by Defendant A, B, and C is intended to be exported, imported, or returned, such goods shall be reported to the head of the relevant customs office and the goods shall not be imported without filing a declaration thereon;

A. On February 17, 2015, the Defendants, who imported smuggling, had the highest import rate of 45 per cent of the China’s Republic of Korea (rate of duty 270 per cent) and had the highest import of the China’s Republic of Korea, expressed that the Defendants were willing to play a customs clearance role, including customs inspection and import declaration for the China’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic

Defendant

A around February 17, 2015, at the entrance of two containers in China, loaded 7,500 km in the middle atmosphere of China at the second entrance of a container, concealed 38,784 km in the middle-sea of Korea on the inside of the container as the so-called 'Stainer' method of loading KRW 230,764,80 in the market price of China on the inside of the container, and then carried in the name of 'G'. Defendant B sent documents, etc. necessary for customs clearance and import clearance delivered in advance by Defendant A upon arrival of the above goods at the military port of military origin. Defendant C attempted to import the above vehicle scrap by attending the container inspection site and informing Defendant B of the customs inspection progress at the request of Defendant B, but was found to have been discovered and attempted.

B. On April 16, 2015, the Defendants, as indicated in the preceding paragraph, were exposed to the customs office to import scrap scrap so as to cause damage. In order to avoid customs control, the Defendants used the name “H” under the name of Pyeongtaek Military Port, which has a high import performance, to avoid customs control, as if they were imported from I, and sell it to Korea after being closely imported red powder powder in Korea (270% of the rate of customs duty) in which water is mixed with water, by pretending that they were imported from I.