beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.12.11 2016가단3959

공유물분할

Text

All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The instant real estate was registered for ownership preservation under the name of K on December 25, 1917 (Fe. 25 December 1917). On September 26, 1923 (Fe. 26 September 1923), the ownership transfer registration was made in the name of L (the Plaintiff’s largest A) on the grounds of sale on September 26, 1923. On November 21, 193 (Fe. 21 November 21, 193), M (A.), N (Defendant’s increase)O (the Plaintiff), P4, P4, the ownership transfer registration was completed on the grounds of sale on the grounds of M (the Plaintiff’s increase and decrease), P4, P4, under the Act No. 15815, Jun. 16, 1994, the Cheongju District Court received the Republic of Korea Registry under the Act No. 15815, Mar. 4, 194.

B. U’s fourth ASEAN’s R on October 3, 2012 and Plaintiff A(V’s largest AV Y’s descendants)’s R transferred on April 30, 2013, and Plaintiff B (V’s second Z AA’s descendants) died on October 9, 2012 and completed the inheritance registration by each agreement division, and S died on November 11, 2013 and succeeded to the remainder of the Defendants except Defendant I (Defendant D’s third son’s third son’s descendants).

C. On July 26, 2016, U, which was the Plaintiff, recognized that the instant real estate was the land created for the purpose of gathering the vision of the VVI land, and donated that portion to Defendant I on July 26, 2016 and withdrawn the instant lawsuit.

AC A A The following table shall be as follows:

The facts that there is no dispute over AC AD AE AF AG AG AG AJ AJ AG AG AG AG AG AG AG AG AG AG AG AP AP AP AM AM AG BB BPP L L BG M BG M BG M BG BG M M BG BF M, and the facts that there is no dispute over Gap, Eul's 1, 6 through 12 (including household numbers), Eul's 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, and 10 evidence, and the overall purport of the pleadings, the entire purport of the pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The land of this case asserted by the parties is jointly owned by the plaintiffs, defendant I, and the other Defendants, with one-fourth shares, and the co-owners have agreed on the division.