except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the actual operator of D (hereinafter referred to as D).

On September 17, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim G, who was introduced through F, etc. at the office of the company located in Seocho-gu Seoul E-building 302, to the effect that “A project to implement an apartment unit of 498 households in Gyeonggi-gu H members. It is short of model house opening costs, if a loan of KRW 1.50 million is borrowed, it will be repaid at the end of three months, and instead, it would be paid off the above apartment unit after three months.” On the same day, the victim and the victim were to enter into a contract with the victim to set the sales commission of KRW 4,00,000 per household as sales commission to the above H members, and the victim leased the apartment unit of KRW 150,000 to D, and the victim provided the apartment unit of KRW 150,000,000,000 for KRW 1,50,000,000 for the apartment unit of Seoul.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had no particular income or property at the time, and had an individual obligation to pay KRW 00 million, and the above H H H apartment execution project was not only the progress of the promotion committee's name, but also the land purchase work with the prop, and it was not completed for securing the site. The above I apartment supply contract did not have any intent or ability to repay it at once even if the Defendant arbitrarily borrowed the above money from the victim, such as a fake contract, which was forged with the seller's seal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving him from him as the borrowed money from him on September 17, 2012; KRW 18,40,000 won on September 18, 201; KRW 10,000 on September 21, 201; KRW 25,30,000 on September 27, 201; and KRW 10,000 on September 27, 201.